book excerptise:   a book unexamined is wasting trees

An anthropologist on Mars: seven paradoxical tales

Oliver W. Sacks

Sacks, Oliver W.;

An anthropologist on Mars: seven paradoxical tales

Knopf, 1995, 327 pages

ISBN 0679437851 9780679437857

topics: |  neuro | psychology | vision

Oliver Sacks passed away this week, so I thought I would revisit one of his favourite works...

This is yet another fascinating collection of case studies from the indomitable Sacks.

Much of the book deals with vision, starting off with colour-blindness (ch 1), prodiguous graphic savants (ch 6), and the problems when a congenitally blind person has his eyesight restored as an adult (ch 4).

In The Last Hippie the patient Greg F. is blind and unable to remember anything in the present. This story is the real-life basis for the movie "The Music Never Stopped" (2011).

The title story is about another high-functioning autist; the "Anthropologist on Mars" is Prof. Temple Grandin, who feels like an alien observer when she is with "normal" (non-autistic) people.

 

Excerpts



1 The Case of the Colorblind Painter

describes Mr. Jonathan I who is a well-known painter, with a long association
with colours:

	He knew the colors of everything, with an extraordinary exactness (he
	could give not only the names but the numbers of colors as these were
	listed in a Pantone chart of hues he had used for many years). He
	could identify the green of van Gogh's billiard table in this way
	unhesitatingly. 7

So one day he was hit by a truck and had a concussion.  A day later, he found
his world "misty and grey".   He was given a ticket for going through two red
lights.  However, 

	Mr. I. arrived at his studio with relief, expecting that the horrible
	mist would be gone, that everything would be clear again. But as soon
	as he entered, he found his entire studio, which was hung with
	brilliantly colored paintings, now utterly grey and void of
	color. His canvases, the abstract color paintings he was known for,
	were now greyish or black and white.

And they remained thus - he was profoundly colour-blind.   And the colours he
saw were not a gray or black - as he describes it later: 

	neither "grey" nor "leaden" could begin to convey what his world was
	actually like. It was not "grey" that he experienced, he said, but
	perceptual qualities for which ordinary experience, ordinary
	language, had no equivalent. ... 11

	as he was driving to the studio one morning. He saw the sunrise over
	the highway, the blazing reds all turned into black: "The sun rose
	like a bomb, like some enormous nuclear explosion," he said later.
	"Had anyone ever seen a sunrise in this way before?" 14


Parts of his description, draws on deep scholarship, but at the same time
manages to be lyrical: 

	Color is not a trivial subject but one that has compelled, for
	hundreds of years, a passionate curiosity in the greatest artists,
	philosophers, and natural scientists. The young Spinoza wrote his
	first treatise on the rainbow; the young Newton's most joyous
	discovery was the composition of white light; Goethe's great color
	work, like Newton's, started with a prism; Schopenhauer, Young,
	Helmholtz, and Maxwell, in the last century, were all tantalized by
	the problem of color; and Wittgenstein's last work was his Remarks on
	Colour. And yet most of us, most of the time, overlook its great
	mystery. p.4

Testing : Colours as shades of gray


We then gave him a large mass of yarns, containing thirty- three separate
colors, and asked him to sort these: he said he could not sort them by color,
but only by grey-scale tonal values. He then, rapidly and easily, separated
the yarns into four strange, chromatically random piles, which he
characterized as 0-25 percent, 25-50 percent, 50-75 percent, and 75-100
percent on a grey-tone scale (though nothing looked to him purely white, and
even white yarn looked slightly "dingy" or "dirty").

... a black-and-white photograph and a black- and-white video camera
confirmed that Mr. I. had indeed accurately divided the colored yarns in a
grey scale that basically coincided with their own mechanical reading.


Theories of Colour Perception

The colors of objects, Newton thought, were determined by the "copiousness"
with which they reflected particular rays to the eye. 

Thomas Young, in 1802, feeling that there was no need to have an infinity of
different receptors in the eye, each tuned to a different wavelength
(artists, after all, could create almost any color they wanted by using a
very limited palette of paints) postulated that three types of receptors
would be enough:

	As it is almost impossible to conceive each sensitive point of the
	retina to contain an infinite number of particles, each capable of
	vibrating in perfect unison with every possible undulation,
	it becomes necessary to suppose the number limited, for
	instance to the three principal colours, red, yellow, and blue." 18

The idea lay dormant for fifty years, until Hermann von Helmholtz resurrected
it and gave it a new precision, so that we now speak of the Young- Helmholtz
hypothesis.

For Helmholtz, colour was the translation of
[wavelength into receptor signal]: "Red light stimulates the red-sensitive
fibres strongly,  
and the other two weakly, giving the sensation red."

Schopenhauer : Oppponens theory


In 1816, the young Schopenhauer proposed a different theory of color vision,
one that envisaged not a passive, mechanical resonance of tuned particles or
receptors, as Young had postulated, but their active stimulation,
competition, and inhibition—an explicit "opponens" theory such as Ewald
Hering was to create seventy years later, in apparent contradiction of the
Young-Helmholtz theory.  

These opponens theories were ignored at the time, and continued to be
ignored until the 1950s.

We now envisage a combination of Young-Helmholtz and opponens mechanisms...
the colour perception system pays attention to the differences or
oppositions between the three tuned receptors... Thus
integration and selection, as Schopenhauer divined, start in the retina.

	 
	oppponent colours.  red-green colourblinds like me
	do not see much of a distinction in the middle column. 

Colour perception in the brain

In 1884, neurologist physician Hermann Wilbrand - [based on seeing patients with
a range of visual losses] - suggested that there must be separate visual centers
in the primary visual cortex for "light impressions," "color impressions,"
and "form impressions," though he had no anatomical evidence for this.

That achromatopsia (and even hemi-achromatopsia) could indeed arise from
damage to specific parts of the brain was first confirmed, four years later,
by a Swiss ophthalmologist, Louis Verrey. He described a sixty-year-old woman
who, in consequence of a stroke affecting the occipital lobe of her left
hemisphere, now saw everything in the right half of her visual field in
shades of grey (the left half remained normally colored). The opportunity to
examine his patient's brain after her death showed damage confined to a small
portion (the fusiform and lingual gyri) of the visual cortex—it was here,
Verrey concluded, that "the centre for chromatic sense will be found."

Opposition to the idea of a chromatic center


That such a center might exist, that any part of the cortex might be
specialized for the perception or representation of color, was immediately
contested and continued to be contested for almost a century. The grounds of
this contention go very deep, as deep as the philosophy of neurology itself.

Locke, in the seventeenth century, had held to a "sensationalist" philosophy
(which paralleled Newton's physicalist one): our senses are measuring
instruments, recording the external world for us in terms of
sensation. Neurologists in the late nineteenth century were quick to accept
this philosophy and to embed it in a speculative anatomy of the brain.
Visual perception was equated with "sense-data" or "impressions" transmitted
from the retina to the primary visual area of the brain, in an exact,
point-to-point correspondence—and there experienced, subjectively, as an
image of the visual world.

Color, it was presumed, was an integral part of this image. There was no
room, anatomically, it was thought, for a separate color center—or indeed,
conceptually, for the very idea of one. Thus when Verrey published his
findings in 1888, they flew in the face of accepted doctrine. His
observations were doubted, his testing criticized, his examination regarded
as flawed—but the real objection, behind these, was doctrinal in nature.

If there was no discrete color center, so the thinking went, there could be
no isolated achromatopsia either; thus Verrey's case, and two similar ones in
the 1890s, were dismissed from neurological consciousness — and cerebral
achromatopsia, as a subject, all but disappeared for the next seventy-five
years.

Goethe and the constancy of colour perception

Goethe's color theory, his Faibenlehre (which he regarded as the equal of
his entire poetic opus), was, by and large, dismissed by all his
contemporaries and has remained in a sort of limbo ever since, seen as the
whimsy, the pseudoscience, of a very great poet. 

But science itself was not entirely insensitive to the "anomalies" that
Goethe considered central, and Helmholtz, indeed, gave admiring lectures on
Goethe and his science...

Helmholtz was very conscious of "color constancy"—the way in which the colors
of objects are preserved, so that we can categorize them and always know what
we are looking at, despite great fluctuations in the wavelength of the light
illuminating them. The actual wavelengths reflected by an apple, for
instance, will vary considerably depending on the illumination, but we
consistently see it as red, nonetheless. This could not be, clearly, a mere
translation of wavelength into color. There had to be some way, Helmholtz
thought, of "discounting the illumi- nant"—and this he saw as an "unconscious
inference" or "an act of judgement" (though he did not venture to suggest
where such judgement might occur). Color constancy, for him, was a special
example of the way in which we achieve perceptual
constancy generally, make a stable perceptual world from a 
chaotic sensory flux—a world that would not be possible if 
our perceptions were merely passive reflections of the  
unpredictable and inconstant input that bathes our receptors. 

Maxwell: Synthesizing colour from three channels

Helmholtz's contemporary, James Clerk Maxwell, had also been fascinated by
the mystery of color vision from his student days. He formalized the notions
of primary colors and color mixing by the invention of a color top (the
colors of which fused, when it was spun, to yield a sensation of grey), and a
graphic representation with three axes, a color triangle, which showed how
any color could be created by different mixtures of the three primary colors.

These prepared the way for his most spectacular demonstration, the
demonstration in 1861 that color photography was possible, despite the fact
that photographic emulsions were themselves black and white. He did this by
photographing a colored bow three times, through red, green, and violet
niters. Having obtained three "color- separation" images, as he called them,
he now brought these together by superimposing them upon a screen, projecting
each image through its corresponding filter (the image taken through the red
filter was projected with red light, and so on).

Maxwell wondered if this was how colors were perceived in the brain, by the
addition of color-separation images or their neural correlates, as in his
magic-lantern demonstrations. 

[These experiments led to the development of colour cameras - initially very
bulky with three separate channels - but gradually more compact.  It was not
until 1907, however, that the Lumiere brothers developed the Autochrome
process, where tiny starch grains dyed red, green, and violet, on the
photographic emulsion, acted as a sort of Maxwellian grid through which the
three color-separation images, mosaicked together, could both be taken and
viewed.

Edwin Land : Colour relativism - Mondrian experiments

Edwin Land (of Polaroid fame) experimented on the relativity of colour
perception using abstract displays resembling the paintings of Piet Mondrian,
and Land therefore terms them "color Mondrians."

Using the Mondrians, which were illuminated by three projectors, using
long-wave (red), middle-wave (green), and short-wave (blue) filters, Land was
able to prove that, if a surface formed part of a complex multicolored scene,
there was no simple relationship between the wavelength of light reflected
from a surface and its perceived color.

If, moreover, a single patch of color (for example, one ordinarily seen as
green) was isolated from its surrounding colors, it would appear only as
white or pale grey, whatever illuminating beam was used. Thus the green
patch, Land showed, could not be regarded as inherently green, but was, in
part, given its greenness by its relation to the surrounding areas of the
Mondrian. 

Semir Zeki : Colour vision in V4

If Land was approaching the problem of how we see colors at a psychophysical
level by asking human subjects to report how they perceived complex,
multicolored mosaics in changing illuminations, Semir Zeki, working in
London, was approaching the problem at a physiological level, by inserting
microelectrodes in the visual cortex of anesthetized monkeys and measuring
the neuronal potentials generated when they were given colored stimuli.

Early in the 1970s, he was able to make a crucial discovery, to delineate a
small area of cells on each side of the brain, in the prestriate cortex of
monkeys (areas referred to as V4), which seemed to be specialized for
responding to color (Zeki called these "color-coding cells"). 

Thus, ninety years after Wilbrand and Verrey had postulated a specific center
for color in the brain, Zeki was finally able to prove that such a center
existed.

Movement sensing area

Zeki was also able to find cells, in an adjacent area, that seemed to respond
solely to movement. A remarkable account and analysis of a patient with a
pure "motion blindness" was given by Zihl, Von Cramon, and Mai in 1983. The
patient's problems are described as follows:

	The visual disorder complained of by the patient was a loss of
	movement vision in all three dimensions. She had difficulty, for
	example, in pouring tea or coffee into a cup because the fluid
	appeared to be frozen, like a glacier. In addition, she could not
	stop pouring at the right time since she was unable to perceive the
	movement in the cup (or a pot) when the fluid rose. Furthermore the
	patient complained of difficulties in following a dialogue because
	she could not see the movement of the face and, especially, the mouth
	of the speaker. In a room where more than two other people were
	walking, she felt very insecure and unwell, and usually left the room
	immediately, because "people were suddenly here or there but I have
	not seen them moving." 

	The patient experienced the same problem but to an even more marked
	extent in crowded streets or places, which she therefore avoided as
	much as possible.  She could not cross the street because of her
	inability to judge the speed of a car, but she could identify the car
	itself without difficulty. "When I'm looking at the car first, it
	seems far away. But then, when I want to cross the road, suddenly the
	car is very near."  She gradually learned to "estimate" the distance
	of moving vehicles by means of the sound becoming louder.

Helping Mr. I

When I phoned Professor Zeki to tell him of this exceptional patient, he was
greatly intrigued and wondered, in particular, how Mr. I. might do with
Mondrian testing, such as he and Land had used with normally sighted people
and with animals. He at once arranged to come to New York to join us— Bob
Wasserman, my ophthalmologist colleague; Ralph Siegel, a neurophysiologist;
and myself—in a comprehensive testing of Jonathan I. No patient with
achromatopsia had ever been examined in this way before.

[The Mondrian testing clarified the nature of the problem, and also served to
pinpoint the location of the trouble. Mr. I.'s primary visual cortex was
essentially intact, and it was the secondary cortex (specifically the V4
areas, or their connections) that bore virtually the whole brunt of the
damage.  These areas are very small, even in man; yet all our perception of
color, all our ability to imagine or remember it, all our sense of living in
a world of color, depend crucially on their integrity. A mischance had
devastated these bean-sized areas of Mr. I.'s brain—and with this, his whole
life, his life-world, had been changed.

[But can do little to help Mr. I]

We were, however, able to offer a little practical help. Mr. I.  had
consistently seen the boundaries of the Mondrian patches most clearly when
these were illuminated by medium- wavelength light, and Dr. Zeki therefore
suggested we give him a pair of green sunglasses, transmitting only this
waveband in which he saw most clearly. A pair of glasses was specially made,
and Mr. I. took to wearing them, especially in bright sunlight. The new
glasses delighted him, for although they did nothing to restore his lost
color vision, they did seem noticeably to enhance his contrast vision and his
perception of form and boundaries. He could even enjoy color TV with his wife
again. (The dark-green glasses, in effect, rendered the color set
monochromatic—though he continued to prefer his old black-and-white set when
alone.)

Mr. I. adapts


Mr. I., in the second year after his injury, found that he saw best in
subdued light or twilight, and not in the full glare of day. Very bright
light tended to dazzle and temporarily blind him—another sign of damage to
his visual systems—but he found the night and nightlife peculiarly congenial,
for they seemed to be "designed," as he once said, "in terms of black and
white."

	I have developed acute night vision, it's amazing what I see — I can
	read license plates at night from four blocks away. You couldn't see
	it from a block away. 

Although Mr. I. does not deny his loss, and at some level still mourns it, he
has come to feel that his vision has become "highly refined," "privileged,"
that he sees a world of pure form, uncluttered by color. Subtle textures and
patterns, normally obscured for the rest of us because of their embedding in
color, now stand out for him.   He feels he has been given "a whole new
world," which the rest of us, distracted by color, are insensitive to. 

He no longer thinks of color, pines for it, grieves its loss. He has almost
come to see his achromatopsia as a strange gift, one that has ushered him
into a new state of sensibility and being. In this his transformation is
exceedingly similar to that of John Hull, who, after two or three years of
experiencing blindness as an affliction and curse, came to see it as "a dark,
paradoxical gift," a "concentrated human condition . . . one of the orders of
human being."

In terms of his painting, after a year or more of experiment and uncertainty,
Mr. I. has moved into a strong and productive phase, as strong and productive
as anything in his long artistic career. His black-and-white paintings are
highly successful, and people comment on his creative renewal, the remarkable
black-and-white "phase" he has moved into. Very few of them know that his
latest phase is anything other than an expression of his artistic
development, that it was brought about by a calamitous loss.



2 The Last Hippie

"The Last Hippie" has been widely commented on; it focuses on a patient who
loses his vision completely owing to a large tumour.    He also regresses
into his youth, and retains a love for rock bands.  It was made into the
critically acclaimed movie by Jim Kohlberg - "The Music Never Stopped"
(after the GD song). 


trailer from the movie ""The Music Never Stopped" (2011).  


The story (and the movie) ends on an emotionally powerful scene where Sacks
has organized tickets for a Grateful Dead concert at the Madison Square
Garden.  Unexpectedly, Greg starts to to talk spontaneously — very unusual
for him — and to reminisce about the sixties - using the present tense
since he has continued to live in his youth:

	Yeah, there were the be-ins in Central Park. They haven't had one for
	a long time — over a year, maybe, can't remember
	exactly.... Concerts, music, acid, grass, everything....  First time
	I was there was Flower-Power Day.... Good times ...lots of things
	started in the sixties—acid rock, the be-ins, the love-ins,
	smoking.... Don't see it much these days.... Allen Ginsberg — he's
	down in the Village a lot, or in Central Park. I haven't seen him for
	a long time. It's over a year since I last saw him....

About the hash-laden air:  "What a great smell," he said, inhaling deeply. 
"It's the least stupid smell in the world."

Greg enjoys the first half of the concert, when they are playing old familiar
songs.  The second half he is intrigued by the "futuristic" songs. 

The next day, when Sacks to meet him at the hospital. 

	I found Greg in the dining room, alone, facing the wall. I asked him
	about the Grateful Dead —- what did he think of them?
	
	   "Great group," he said, "I love them. I heard them in Central Park
	and at the Fillmore East."
	
	   "Yes," I said, "you told me. But have you seen them since?  Didn't
	you just hear them at Madison Square Garden?"
	
	"No," he said, "I've never been to the Garden."  p.76

But later he seems to be able to recognize some of the new piecces he had
heard at the concert. 



4. To See and Not See


	[patient Virgil, who has been blind since early childhood, has his
 	 cataracts removed.]   p.108

Virgil told me later that in this first moment he had no idea what he was
seeing. There was light, there was movement, there was color, all mixed up,
all meaningless, a blur. Then out of the blur came a voice that said, "Well?"
Then, and only then, he said, did he finally realize that this chaos of light
and shadow was a face -- and, indeed, the face of his surgeon.

The rest of us, born sighted, can scarcely imagine such confusion. For we,
born with a full complement of senses, and correlating these, one with the
other, create a sight world from the start, a world of visual objects and
concepts and meanings. When we open our eyes each morning, it is upon a world
we have spent a lifetime learning to see.

Virgil saw, but what he saw had no coherence. His retina and optic nerve were
active, transmitting impulses, but his brain could make no sense of them; he
was, as neurologists say, agnosic.

Virgil could recognize large alphabets - esp capital letters - but had a
lot of difficulty recognizing faces, or the cat, and with shapes generally,
and with size and distance.

He told me that he had learned the alphabet by touch at school, where
they had used letter blocks, or cutout letters, for teaching the blind.

    I was reminded of [R.L.] Gregory's patient S.B.: "much to our surprise,
    he could even tell the time by means of a large clock on the wall. We
    were so surprised at this that we did not at first believe that he
    could have been in any sense blind before the operation."

    But in his blind days S.B. had used a large hunter watch with no glass,
    telling the time by touching the hands, and he had apparently made an
    instant "cross-modal" transfer, to use Gregory's term, from touch to
    vision.

We achieve perceptual constancy -- the correlation of all the different
appearances, the transforms of objects -- very early, in the first months of
life. It constitutes a huge learning task, but is achieved so smoothly, so
unconsciously, that its enormous complexity is scarcely realized (though it
is an achievement that even the largest supercomputers cannot begin to
match).





Notre Dame sketch by graphic savant Stephen Wiltshire, drawn at age 14. (click to enlarge)

6 Prodigies


'Before the late 19th c., all types of mental trauma were considered simply
as "madness".  In late 19th c., the German physician Emile Kraepelin
suggested that mental disorders can take two forms -

    a. manic depression (now seen as a range of conditions termed "bipolar
	disorder"), and
    b. schizophrenia, which he called dementia praecox (lit. "early"
	dementia -  to distinguish it from late dementia such as Alzheimers).

The term autism was only identified in the 1940s and was not a term, or even
a concept, in the 1860s. p.190

[The term had been used earlier by Eugen Bleuler to describe schizophrenic
patients  who were withdrawn.]


Musical genius : Blind Tom (b. 1849)


	[Blind Tom] has never been instructed in music or educated in any
	way. He learned to play the piano from hearing others, learns airs
	and tunes from hearing them sung, and can play any piece on first
	trial as well as the most accomplished performer. . . . One of his
	most remarkable feats was the performance of three pieces of music at
	once. He played Fisher's Hornpipe with one hand and Yankee Doodle
	with the other and sang Dixie all at once. He also played a piece
	with his back to the piano and his hands inverted. He performs many
	pieces of his own conception—one, his "Battle of Manassas," may be
	called picturesque and sublime, a true conception of unaided, blind
	musical genius. . . . This poor blind boy is cursed with but little
	of human nature; he seems to be an unconscious agent acting as he is
	acted on, and his mind a vacant receptacle where Nature stores her
	jewels to recall them at her pleasure.

from Darold Treffert's "Extraordinary People: Understanding Idiot Savants"
(1989).

	[Born nearly blind, the fourteenth child of a slave, sold to a
	Colonel Bethune, Tom was, from infancy,] fascinated by sounds of all
	sorts — rain on the roof, the grating of corn in the sheller, but
	most of all music -— Tom would listen intensely to the colonel's
	daughters practicing their sonatas and minuets on the piano."

Edouard Seguin, French physician, describes Tom in his 1866 book, "Idiocy and
Its Treatment by the Psychological Method," :

	Till five or six years old he could not speak, scarce walk, and gave
	no other sign of intelligence than this everlasting thirst for music.

	At four years already, if taken out from the corner where he lay
	dejected, and seated at the piano, he would play beautiful tunes; his
	little hands having already taken possession of the keys, and his
	wonderful ear of any combination of notes they had once heard.

At the age of six, Tom started to improvise on his own account. Word of the
"blind genius" spread, and at seven Tom gave his first concert—and went on to
earn a hundred thousand dollars in his eighth year.

At eleven, he played before President Buchanan at the White House.  A panel of
musicians, who thought that he had tricked the president, tested his memory
the following day, playing two entirely new compositions to him, thirteen and
twenty pages in length—he reproduced them perfectly and without the least
apparent effort.

Although Tom was usually called an idiot or imbecile, his body movements,
described by Seguin, are more characteristic of autism:

	As soon as the new tune begins, Tom takes some ludicrous posture
	[with one leg outstretched, while he slowly pirouettes on the other]
	. . .  long gyrations . . . ornamented with spasmodic movements of
	the hands.

Autism - characterized by Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger : 1940s


Autism was medically described, almost simultaneously, in the 1940s, by Leo
Kanner in Baltimore and Hans Asperger in Vienna. Both of them, independently,
named it "autism."

Kanner's and Asperger's accounts were in many ways strikingly (at times
uncannily) similar —- a nice example of historical synchronicity. Both
emphasized "aloneness," mental aloneness, as the cardinal feature of autism;
this, indeed, was why they called it autism.

In Kanner's words, this aloneness "whenever possible, disregards, ignores,
shuts out anything that comes to the child from the outside." This lack of
contact, he felt, was only in regard to people; objects, by contrast, might
be normally enjoyed. The other defining feature of autism, for Kanner, was
"an obsessive insistence on sameness," in the form of repetitive, stereotyped
movements and noises, or stereotypies, most simply; then in the adoption of
elaborate rituals and routines; finally, in the appearance of strange, narrow
preoccupations -— highly focused, intense fascinations and fixations.

The appearance of such fascinations, and the adoption of such rituals, often
before the age of five, were not to be seen, Kanner and Asperger thought, in
any other condition.  Asperger brought out other striking features,
stressing,

	they do not make eye contact . . . they seem to take in things with
	short, peripheral glances . . . [there is] a poverty of facial
	expressions and gestures . . . the use of language appears
	abnormal, unnatural. . . the children follow their own impulses,
	regardless of the demands of the environment.

Savant prodigies

Singular talents, usually emerging at a very early age and developing with
startling speed, appear in about 10 percent of the autistic (and in a smaller
number of the retarded—though many savants are both autistic and retarded).

A century before Blind Tom there was Gottfried Mind, a "cretinous imbecile,"
born in Berne in 1768, who showed from an early age a striking talent for
drawing. He had, according to A. F. Tredgold's classic 1908 Text-Book of
Mental Deficiency, "such a marvellous faculty for drawing pictures of cats
that he was known as 'The Cats' Raphael,'" but he also made drawings and
watercolor sketches of deer, rabbits, bears, and groups of children.


from the series, "Cat with three young", by Gottfried Mind (1768-1814)

He soon acquired fame throughout Europe, and one of his pictures was purchased
by George IV.

[However, he could sign his name with greatest difficulty, and had not the
slightest idea of Arithmetic -  source: "The Mirror of Literature",
Anon. 1828, as cited in "Nadia Revisited:
A Longitudinal Study of an Autistic Savant", by Lorna Selfe, 2012]


Calculating genius

		(see detailed descriptions in Mathematical Recreations and Essays
		by H.S.M Coxeter and W.W. Rouse Ball (1987)

In the eighteenth century, Jedediah Buxton, a simpleminded laborer, had
perhaps the most tenacious memory of these. When asked what would be the cost
of shoeing a horse with a hundred and forty nails if the price was one
farthing for the first nail, then doubled for each remaining nail, he arrived
at the (nearly correct) figure of
725,958,096,074,907,868,531,656,993,638,851,106 pounds, 2 shillings, and 8
pence. When he was then asked to square this number (that is, 2139 squared),
he came up with (after two and a half months) a seventy-eight digit answer.
Though some of Buxton's calculations took weeks or months, he was able to
work, to hold conversations, to live his life normally, while doing them. The
prodigious calculations proceeded almost automatically, only throwing their
results into consciousness when completed.

Child prodigies, of course, are not necessarily retarded or autistic—there
have been itinerant calculators of normal intelligence as well. One such was
George Parker Bidder, who as a child and youth gave exhibitions in England
and Scotland.  He could mentally determine the logarithm of any number to
seven or eight places and, apparently intuitively, could divine the factors
for any large number.

Bidder retained his powers throughout life (and indeed made great use of them
in his profession as an engineer) and often tried to delineate the procedures
by which he calculated. In this, however, he was unsuccessful; he could only
say of his results that "they seem to rise with the rapidity of lightning" in
his mind, but that their actual operations were largely inaccessible to him.
His son, also intellectually gifted, was a natural calculator as well, though
not as prodigious.

Feats of Memory


Almost all savants have prodigious powers of memory.  Dr. J. Langdon Down,
one of the greatest observers in this realm, who coined the term "idiot
savant" in 1887, remarked that "extraordinary memory was often associated
with very great defect of reasoning power." He describes giving one of his
patients Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.  The patient had read
the entire book and in a single reading imprinted it in memory. But he had
skipped a line on one page, an error at once detected and corrected. "Ever
after," Down tells us, "when reciting from memory the stately periods of
Gibbon, he would, on coming to the third page, skip the line and go back and
correct the error with as much regularity as if it had been part of the
regular text." Martin A., a savant I wrote about in "A Walking Grove," could
recall the entire nine volumes of Grove's 1954 Dictionary of Music and
Musicians. This had been read to him by his father, and the text would be
"replayed" in his father's voice.

There is a large variety of minor savant skills, frequently
described by physicians like Down and Tredgold, who consulted
at institutions for the "mentally defective."

Tredgold describes J. H. Pullen, "the Genius of Earlswood Asylum," who for
more than fifty years made extremely intricate models of ships and machines,
as well as a very real guillotine, which almost killed one of his
attendants. Tredgold writes of an otherwise retarded savant who could "get" a
complex mechanism like a watch and disassemble and reassemble it swiftly,
with no prior instruction. More recently, physicians have described idiot
savants with extraordinary bodily skills, able to perform acrobatic maneuvers
and athletic feats with the greatest facility—again, with no formal
training. 

Tredgold also writes of savants with various sensory powers and skills, of
olfactory savants -— and of a tactile savant, too:


The birth of the unconscious : F. W. H. Myers


The eccentric psychologist F. W. H. Myers (1843-1901), in his great
turn-of-the-century book, Human Personality, tried to analyze the processes
by which prodigious calculators arrived at their results. He was unable to do
so, any more than could the calculators themselves, but he believed that a
process of "subliminal" mentation or computation was involved, which threw
its results into consciousness when complete. Their methods of calculation
seemed to be—unlike the formal or formulary methods taught in primers and
schools—idiosyncratic and personal, achieved by each calculator through an
individual path. 

[from Human Personality, ch.3 : Genius: 

	I shall suggest, on the other hand, that Genius — if that vaguely
	used word is to receive anything like a psychological definition —
	should rather be regarded as a power of utilising a wider range than
	other men can utilise of faculties in some degree innate in all; — a
	power of appropriating the results of subliminal mentation to
	subserve the supraliminal stream of thought; — so that an
	"inspiration of Genius" will be in truth a subliminal uprush, an
	emergence into the current of ideas which the man is consciously
	manipulating of other ideas which he has not consciously originated,
	but which have shaped themselves beyond his will, in profounder
	regions of his being.
]

Relevance of Autism for understanding the normal mind

Myers was one of the first to write about unconscious or precon scious
cognitive processes and foresaw that an understanding of idiots savants and
their gifts could open not only into a general understanding of the nature of
intelligence and talent but into that vast realm that we now call the
cognitive unconscious.

In the 1940s, when autism was first delineated, it became evident that the
majority of idiot savants were in fact autistic and that the incidence of
savantism in the autistic — nearly 10 percent — was almost two hundred times
its incidence in the retarded population, and thousands of times that of the
population at large.  Furthermore, it became clear that many autistic savants
had multiple talents — musical, mnemonic, visual- graphic, computational, and
so on.

Nadia : Artist at three

In 1977, the psychologist Lorna Selfe published Nadia: A Case of
Extraordinary Drawing Ability in an Autistic Child.  Nadia suddenly started
drawing at the age of three and a half, rendering horses, and later a variety
of other subjects, in a way that psychologists considered "not possible." Her
drawings, they felt, were qualitatively different from those of other
children: she had a sense of space, an ability to depict appearances and
shadows, a sense of perspective such as the most gifted normal child might
only develop at three times her age. She constantly experimented with
different angles and perspectives.  

Whereas normal children go through a developmental sequence from random
scribbling to schematic and geometric figures to "tadpole" figures, Nadia
seemed to bypass these and to move at once into highly recognizable,
detailed representational drawings. The development of drawing in children,
it was felt at the time, paralleled the development of conceptual powers
and language skills; but Nadia, it seemed, just drew what she saw, without
the usual need to "understand" or "interpret" it.  p.196

She not only showed enormous graphic gifts, an unprecedented precocity, but
drew in a way that attested to a wholly different mode of perception and
mind. 

Though prodigious musical abilities tend to show themselves extremely 
early — almost all the great composers exemplify this — "there are no prodigies in 
art," as Picasso said. (Picasso himself was a remarkable draftsman at ten, but 
could not draw horses at three, like Nadia, or cathedrals at seven. | 

Graphic savant: Stephen Wiltshire


Stephen showed some delay in the motor landmarks of infant life—sitting,
standing, hand control, walking—and a resistance to being held. 

In his second and third years, he would not play with other children and
tended to scream or hide in a corner if they approached.

Just before Stephen's third birthday, his father was killed in a motorcycle
accident. Stephen had been strongly attached to him and after his death grew
much more disturbed. He started screaming, rocking, and flapping his hands
and lost what little language he had. 197

[includes many beautiful sketches by Wiltshire, mostly architectural.]


 

the lavish interior of the Chicago Theater.  (click to enlarge]



Contents


1 The Case of the Colorblind Painter 	   3
2 The Last Hippie 			   42
3 A Surgeon's Life 			   77
4 To See and Not See 			   108
5 The Landscape of His Dreams    	   153
6 Prodigies 				   188
7 An Anthropologist on Mars 		   244


About this book

* from NYT obituary for Sacks by Gregory Cowles:


His other books included the best-selling “An Anthropologist on Mars” (1995),
about autistic savants and other patients who managed to thrive with their
disorders;

... Dr. Sacks wrote in “An Anthropologist on Mars,” that illnesses and
disorders “can play a paradoxical role in bringing out latent powers,
developments, evolutions, forms of life that might never be seen or even be
imaginable in their absence.” A young woman with a low I.Q. learns to sing
arias in more than 30 languages, and a Canadian physician with Tourette’s
syndrome learns to perform long, complicated surgical procedures without a
single tic or twitch. Some scholars believe, Dr. Sacks once wrote, that
Dostoyevsky and van Gogh may have had temporal lobe epilepsy, that Bartok
and Wittgenstein may have been autistic, and that Mozart and Samuel Johnson
could have had Tourette’s syndrome.

The 2011 movie “The Music Never Stopped” was adapted from “The Last Hippie,”
one of the case studies collected in “An Anthropologist on Mars.”



* from obituary by Michiko Kakutani:

Dr. Sacks once described himself as a man with an “extreme immoderation in
all my passions,” and his books pulsate with his “violent enthusiasms” and
endless curiosity: his fascination with ferns, cephalopods, jellyfish,
volcanoes, the periodic table — for all the marvels of the natural world; as
well as his passion for swimming, chemistry, photography and perhaps most of
all, writing. Known as Inky as a child, he began keeping journals at the age
of 14. For the shy boy, writing was a way to connect with the world, a way
to order his thoughts; and he kept up the habit throughout his life,
amassing nearly a thousand journals, while using his books and essays to
communicate to readers the romance of science and the creative and
creaturely blessings of being alive.



See also (on BookExcerptise)


  • Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision by Melvyn Goodale and David Milner (2004) [patient Dee has lost shape vision after CO poisoning]. When we held up a pencil, we were not surprised that she couldn’t tell us what it was... In fact, she had no idea whether we were holding it horizontally or vertically. But then something quite extraordinary happened. Before we knew it, Dee had reached out and taken the pencil. [This required her to form the hand so that it knew how the pencil was oriented etc.] ...
  • Vision and the emergence of meaning: blind and sighted children's early language by Anne Dunlea (1989) A now classic example is Shatz's (1974) analysis of how toddlers successfully respond to such directives as "Can you shut the door?" ... the child follows his parent's eye gaze and gesture which are directed toward the door, a strategy which crucially depends on vision. The child's previous observations and explorations equip him with the knowledge that doors can be opened and closed, and the child may pick up the parent's intonation and recognize the utterance as a directive. p.4 [Points towards visually grounded aspects of language that may delay language acquistition in the blind. ]
  • Born on a Blue Day by Daniel Tammet (2007) Tammet is a savant... Days of the week have colours for him - all Wednesdays are "blue days". On Icelandic TV, he convincingly demonstrated that he could learn an entire new language – grammar, inflection and comprehension - in only one week. The number 9 is large and threatening. Primes are rounded like pebbles... The unique point about Daniel (from a neurocognitive viewpoint) is that while he has some severe deficiencies -- he is completely left-right blind, so he can't drive - but he can explain what he thinks he is doing when achieving his high computation and other feats.
  • Mathematical Recreations and Essays by H.S.M Coxeter and W.W. Rouse Ball (1987). Has a large chapter discussing a number of mathematical prodigies.
  • External Links

       
  • Molyneux's problem : In 1688, W Molyneux posed this question to John Locke: A Man, being born blind, and having a Globe and a Cube, nigh of the same bignes, Committed into his Hands, and being taught or Told, which is Called the Globe, and which the Cube, so as easily to distinguish them by his Touch or Feeling; Then both being taken from Him, and Laid on a Table, Let us Suppose his Sight Restored to Him; Whether he Could, by his Sight, and before he touch them, know which is the Globe and which the Cube? Over the centuries, there has been much discussion among philosophers on this problem. The answers can be divided into two groups. By and large, empiricists such as Molyneux, Locke and Berkeley answered in the negative. More rationalist philosophers such as Synge, Lee and Leibniz gave an affirmative answer. I would like to think that the recent rise of the subconscious as the determining factor behind behaviour - relegating the conscious to a possibly epiphenomenal role - has led to the downgrading of the rationalist position... many congenitally blind children in developing countries often do not receive treatment despite having curable conditions because of inadequate medical services. In 2003, Pawan Sinha set up a program in India as a part of which he treated five patients, aged from 8 to 17 years, that almost instantly took them from total congenital blindness to fully seeing. This provided an opportunity to answer Molyneux's problem empirically. Based on this study, it was concluded that the answer to Molyneux's question is likely negative. Although after restoration of sight, the subjects could distinguish between objects visually as effectively as they would do by touch alone, they were unable to form the connection between object perceived using the two different senses. The results of the touch-to-vision tests were barely better than if the subjects had guessed. However, such cross-modal mappings developed rapidly, in the course of a few days (Held, et al., 2011).
  • The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt (pdf): Held, R., and Y. Ostrovsky, B. Degelder, T. Gandhi, S. Ganesh, U. Mathur, and P. Sinha, 2011, Nature Neuroscience, 14: 551–553. Would a blind subject, on regaining sight, be able to immediately visually recognize an object previously known only by touch? We addressed this question, first formulated by Molyneux three centuries ago, by working with treatable, congenitally blind individuals. We tested their ability to visually match an object to a haptically sensed sample after sight restoration. We found a lack of immediate transfer, but such cross-modal mappings developed rapidly.

  • bookexcerptise is maintained by a small group of editors. get in touch with us! bookexcerptise [at] gmail [dot] .com.

    This review by Amit Mukerjee was last updated on : 2015 Sep 03