A.  The lit review section is rather de-focused.  The paragraphs you have would go better in an 
annotated bibl.  What is needed is a more specific review stating how these works are related and particularly their deficiencies w.r.t. the objectives. 

0. Review the papers (or give a table showing which papers use a) parse knowledge, b) other 
linguistic / domain knowledge. c) assume linguistic cues are already translated into logical forms

C. If the annotations are not too big, replace the references w the annotated bibliography. 

E. As part of the results, discuss some ambiguous / failures / difficulties . 
