---section 8
--> Conclusions and Further work
[Need to add some discussion of the results]

=3D=3DREFS on Anaphora / Ellipsis=3D=3D

see attached file ANAP.txt which gives a good idea of the refs in
the annotes.  Of these, a,b below are the most critical, and at least d,e a=
re
worth citing:

---

a. Jurafsky and Martin, Chap. 18 (Discourse)
an anaphora is a "REFERRING EXPRESSION" that "COREFERS" to some
entity already introduced in the discourse context.
Its use depends on the speaker's belief about the role of the
referent within the hearer's set of beliefs.  (p.666).
[In our case, the "context" constitutes the "hearer"'s - in this case
the drawing interpreter's - set of beliefs.]

b. Ruslan Mitkov, Anaphora Resolution, 2002.
chapt 1 of this book will give you a good intro to anaphora.
In particular, if there are some "coreference chains" that you
are seeing - e.g. "the line" is an anaphora referring to AB, say,
and a later "it" may refer to "the line" - then this is a coref
chain.  I am attaching the pdf.
Also, you may have instances of verb anaphora
[e.g. "do the same for XX")

c. Mitkov also has written a shorter simpler chapter in
The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. I have this book
if you would like to look at it.

d. @phdthesis{root-RL-86-phd-ut_semantics-of-anaphora-in-discourse,
  title=3D{The semantics of anaphora in discourse},
  author=3D{Root, Rebecca Louise},
  year=3D{1986},
  school=3D{University of Texas at Austin},

e. @incollection{kamp-van-11_discourse-representation-theory,
  title=3D{Discourse representation theory},
  author=3D{Kamp, Hans and Van Genabith, Josef and Reyle, Uwe},
  booktitle=3D{Handbook of philosophical logic},
  pages=3D{125--394},
  year=3D{2011},
  publisher=3D{Springer},
  annote =3D {

see ANAP.txt
}}

PLEASE READ MAINLY the ch.1 from J&M, and ch.1 (first half) and
ch.2 from Mitkov. d and e, you don't need beyond ANAP.txt

Re: Ellipsis, a good ref is kehler-00_coherence-and-resolution-of-ellipsis.
The description from ANAP.txt is a good intro.
