Stern, Philip J.;
The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India
Oxford University Press, 2011, 320 pages
ISBN 0199875189, 9780199875184
topics: | history | british-raj | 18th-c |
“It is strange, very strange,” reflected the author, statesman, and East India Company employee Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1833, “that a joint stock society of traders ... which, judging a priori from its constitution, we should have said was as little fitted for imperial functions as the Merchant Tailors’ Company or the New River Company, should be intrusted with the sovereignty of a larger population, the disposal of a larger clear revenue, the command of a larger army, than are under the direct management of the Executive Government of the United Kingdom.”
For many then and since, the English East India Company’s victory over the nawab of Bengal at the Battle of Plassey in 1757 and its assumption eight years later of the Mughal office of diwan (revenue collector and administrator) in eastern India had transformed a commercial body into something novel, unnatural, and, in Adam Smith’s words, a “strange absurdity”: that is, a Company-State and a merchant-empire.
[The Company] appointed John Surman of their Patna factory to head an embassy to [the new emperor Farrukhsiyar's] court. He was to be accompanied by Edward Stephenson, John Pratt (who ultimately did not join), Hugh Barker as secretary, the surgeon William Hamilton, and Kwaja Sarhad, an extremely successful Armenian merchant at Calcutta who had been involved in obtaining and delivering the recent instruments as well as the original zamindari grants (Sarhad was also the nephew of Kwaja Kalantar, who had been instrumental in first negotiating with Josiah Child and Jean Chardin for Armenian settlement in Company territories in the late 1680s). Two hundred thousand rupees’ worth of presents were sent from Calcutta under the guard of three hundred soldiers. ... Surman had to rent additional warehouses in Patna to store them. [...] When the group finally departed from Patna in May 1715, they did so in a self-consciously “publick manner.” Surman and his council rode in silver palanquins, trailed by one hundred sixty wagons carrying the presents and other stores, fifteen camels, ten carts, twenty-two oxen pulling large guns. They were accompanied by six company soldiers, a trumpeter, smiths, carpenters, spadesmen, twelve hundred porters, all preceded by two Union flags and an official armed escort from the Mughal Court. The embassy even had with it a clockmaker, whose sole job was to tend to the vast number of clocks it had brought as presents. The Surman embassy also traveled with a sense of its place in history. In anticipation of its departure, Madras had sent Bengal copies of grants dating back to the 1640s and “a full account of our Ancient priviledges, when granted and how confirm’d,” including John Child’s efforts “to have a Generall Phirmaund from the Mogull.” Calcutta made Surman a similar list of grants from former emperors and nawabs in Bengal. Bombay’s instructions for the embassy meanwhile recalled familiar issues, most notably insisting a farman would be unacceptable if it did not prohibit Britons without Company license from residing within Mughal territories. Surman also evidently had with him an account of William Norris’s failed embassy to Aurangzeb on behalf of the new Company fifteen years earlier, as well as a description of a more successful Dutch venture in 1711. On July 5, the embassy entered the town behind a vanguard of drums and trumpets, “flinging” rupee coins into the crowd, in order to “aggrandiz[e] our first appearance.” Surman and Surhad met with Farrukhsiyar two days later, as well as his “Prime Ministers,” including the wazir. Surman’s embassy offered its gifts. Ever eager, they even contemplated renaming Calcutta as Farrukhbandar and the three towns together as a pargana to be known as Farrukhabad (the present Farrukhabad in Utt ar Pradesh had been founded that same year), a proposal tactfully “Laid Aside” when it occurred to them that using the emperor’s name as well as the suffix bandar (port) could serve as grounds for stationing Mughal officials in Calcutta or levying taxes on it. Citing as precedence the Company’s farman from Aurangzeb and other instruments dating back to the early seventeenth century, Surman presented a formal petition requesting nineteen particulars to be covered in the new farman. These included trading concessions, such as free passage and customs for Company goods in Mughal dominions, and greater security of goods landed and traveling through the country. Yet, Surman also pressed on a number of long-standing issues concerning the Company’s political establishment: immunity from the farmaish, faujdari, and zamindari demands of other local officials over Calcutta or British subjects; a confirmation of the right to mint rupees at Madras; full and permanent control over the Company’s factories at Patna and Surat; an unambiguous and perpetual sett lement of the zamindari over the towns in the environs of Calcutta, Sutanuti, and Govindpur; the rights to Divi Island near Madras; and a positive order for the protection of Fort St. David from the “Severall Jemidars &ca round that place [that] are troubling & molesting us.” He also demanded the return of the five towns Da’ud Khan had granted to Thomas Pitt for Madras, which Da’ud and the diwan of Arcot (and later nawab), Sa’adatullah Khan, had recently attempted take back. During the inevitable delays and further petitions that followed, Surman amended his request with six more demands, including rights to coin at Bombay and the standing rights to “punish . . . According to law” any Mughal subjects who might commit a crime within the Company’s jurisdiction in Bengal. A year and a half later, the embassy had still not accomplished its goal. In 1717 Surman had almost given up, and was poised to leave Shahjahanabad without his farman . As the story goes, the Company’s fortunes were reversed by what the London directors called “a very lucky accident”: the surgeon William Hamilton had “miraculously” cured the emperor of what was only ambiguously referred to as a “malignant distemper,” and which has over the years been assumed to be everything from a tumor to a venereal disease. True or not, the story fit a pattern, as it resonated with the equally potentially apocryphal account of the Company surgeon Gabriel Boughton, whose treatment of Jahanara, the favorite daughter of Shah Jahan, had been long credited for securing the Company its first grants for a factory in Bengal in the 1640s. It also did not hurt matters that the embassy continued to spend a remarkable sum in tribute and presents, while Bombay renewed its threats to stop its trade from Surat and cease its Arabian convoys. Whatever the cause, Farrukhsiyar finally consented to grant the farman. The directors in London, who had become extremely agitated with the time and expense of the embassy — while at Delhi, Surman and his council were disbursing per month more than Calcutta spent on its garrison, including periodic charges for new pillowcases for their palanquins, nautch dancers, and a serious stockpile of pickles — now “applaud[ed] the obtaining so many Phirmaunds & Particular favours never granted before by the Mogull to any Nation.” They expressed their gratitude to Surman personally in the form of a £5,000 bonus. There was revelry at Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay, including feasting, drinking, gun salutes, bonfires, and parades. [for more details, see: C. R. Wilson, The Early Annals of the the English in Bengal , vol. 2, pt. 2, The Surman Embassy (Asiatic Society, 1911; repr. 1963) ].
ARRACK liquor or spirit, commonly distilled from coconut palm sap, rice, or sugarcane BANDAR port BANIAN western Indian Hindu merchant BHANDARI western Indian Hindu maritime martial caste BICHARA local deliberative assemblies and law courts, usually Malay BUCKSHAW dried bummalo fish; as a verb, the practice of fertilizing crops, particularly coconut trees, with fermented or rotten buckshaw CARTAZES Portuguese shipping passes CHOP seal or stamp, often used to mark official documents or passes DASTAK permit or pass, usually Mughal DIWAN provincial revenue farmer and administrator, usually Mughal FANAM Southern Indian currency, gold or silver coin equivalent to about 3 d. FARMAN lit., “command”; imperial grant, patent, charter FAUJDAR lit., “army-holder”; head of tributary military or police FORCE, usually Mughal GROAB small ship or galley HAVALDAR lit., “offi ce/charge-holder”; head of military or fort jurisdiction, usually Maratha HUSB-UL-HUKM imperial order or instruction JAGIR assignment of revenue KAUL grant or order, usually southern India KOLI laborer MUTASADDI a Mughal port head or governor of a port town MUCKADAM among other usages, a ship’s pilot NAYAK Southern Indian ruler, often of a tributary state under Vijayanagara empire NAWAB a Mughal provincial governor or viceroy OLA lit., “palm leaf ”; Tamil grant or order ORANG-KAYA Malay noble or merchant oligarchy PAGODA Southern Indian currency, gold or silver coin equivalent to about 9 shillings; also, a Hindu temple PALANQUIN a litter or sedan chair, often consisting of a covered box carried on poles PANCHAYAT local caste or village council PARWANA order, grant, or pass PESKASH offering, tribute, or gift , most often to a government offi cial PHRAKALANG in Burma and Siam, chief minister or foreign minister QILIDAR lit., “fort-holder”; commander of a fort or castle RUPEE Mughal currency, silver coin; exchange varied between 2s 3d and 2s 6d SANAD grant or deed SARAF money-changer SHAHBANDAR lit., “ruler of the port”; chief port and customs offi cial TANKA assignment of revenue TOPASS slang for a mestizo Indo-Portuguese soldier VAKIL agent or representative (now, lit., “lawyer”) VOC Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie, or United (Dutch) East India Company WAZIR minister, often chief minister, to a Muslim king or emperor XERAPHIN western Indian currency; equivalent to between 1s 6d and 1s 8d ZAMINDAR lit., “land-holder”; regional Mughal revenue farmer with administrative, juridical, and police responsibilities
Preface vii Introduction: “A State in the Disguise of a Merchant” 3
1 “Planting & Peopling Your Colony”: Building a Company-State 19 2 “A Sort of Republic for the Management of Trade”: The Jurisdiction of a Company-State 41 3 “A Politie of Civill and Military Power”: Diplomacy, War, and Expansion 61 4 “Politicall Science and Martiall Prudence”: Political Th ought and Political Economy 83 5 “The Most Sure and Profitable Sort of Merchandice”: Protestantism and Piety 100
6 “Great Warrs Leave Behind them Long Tales”: Crisis and Response in Asia after 1688 121 7 “Auspicio Regis et Senatus Angliae” : Crisis and Response in Britain after 1688 142 8 “The Day of Small Things”: Civic Governance in the New Century 164 9 “A Sword in One Hand & Money in the Other”: Old Patterns, New Rivals 185 Conclusion: “A Great and Famous Superstructure” 207