Osborne, Richard; Ralph Edney (ill.);
Philosophy for Beginners
Writers and Readers Publishing, 1993, 186 pages
ISBN 086316157X, 9780863161575
topics: | philosophy | history | comic
Short and pithy and humorous, this book provides a lightning sweep through Western philosophy nonetheless. While it is of course very shallow and incomplete, it still remains one of the more useful summaries of philosophy I've read. Closely followed in interestingness would be Russell's History of western philosophy, but Russell is much more opinionated (q.v. his trashing of Aristole's notion of "category"). The narrative runs through the key personalities in Western philosophy; traces a history of the major ideas through brief bios (focusing on eccentricities) of about 200 philosophers and groups. Samples many of the key ideas and presents this in a humourous garb. Opens with a cartoon on "how to recognize a philosopher in the street" - a couple with baby in pram are observing a hooded cloaked man, walking briskly by while reading a book. A feminist stance in an opening cartoon about what is philosophy, and also in the closing section (post-Derrida). Picks out the most interesting, and sharpest delineation of the ideas - e.g. Kant's rationalist ethics - his Categorical Imperative, leads to the conclusion that "To tell a falsehood to a murderer who asked us whether our friend, of whom he was in pursuit, had taken refuge in our house, would be a crime." It is these distilled gleanings that make it so un-put-downable for a philosophy text - full of new, interesting ideas on every page, though the illustrations are also great - e.g. see the picture of the capital like a tongue awaiting its human morsels (p.104). - AM
Sophists (just before Socrates) p.11: Protagoras: Man is the measure of all things. Essentially a practical man, Protagoras thought real knowledge was not possible. What mattered was "useful opinion" == Deep skepticist position, disagreements cannot be decided by an appeal to the truth. p.10 Socrates (470-399BC): An unexamined life is not worth living p.11 (ho de anexetastos bios ou biôtos anthrôpôi) [in Apology 38a, Plato - account of Socrates' trial, Refusing to accept exile from Athens or a commitment to silence as his penalty, he maintains that public discussion of the great issues of life and virtue is a necessary part of any valuable human life.] Knowledge is virtue - what makes man sin is lack of knowledge; overriding cause of Evil was ignorance. [un-Christian stance in ethics] Plato (428-354BC) : Engraved on his academy: "Let no one ignorant of geometry enter here" Hobbes, Leviathan: In "State of nature", "Man is a wolf to man", fighting each other viciously for resources. But man is also rational, so they renounce certain rights and form a social contract, and form a commonwealth w a sovereign who is the "sum of the individuals". The ruler is absolute, and Man has no right to rebel - p.87. This view opposed by Locke: 2nd Treatise on Government, 1690 (attacking Hobbes) "The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions." - p.88