Gould, Stephen Jay;
The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History
W. W. Norton & Company, Incorporated, 1987, 476 pages
ISBN 0393303756, 9780393303759
topics: | zoology | paleontology
The essays work their way through scientific history since the mid-1800's, along the way stopping to sniff the flowers beside E.E. Just's grave, Lord Kelvin's radioactive decay, and Gould's own work with land snails in the Bahamas. Contents Prologue 1. Zoonomia (and Exceptions) 1. The Flamingo's Smile 2. Only His Wings Remained although the idea of sexual cannibalism has a certain horrid fascination, it's a relatively rare event. For male mantises, the whole enterprise of mating is fraught with danger. Approach her from the front & you're likely to be history; you'll be greeted as prey and not partner. So male mantises approach (with caution) from behind, leap on the female's back, hold on tight - and leave rather quickly once it's all over. Even then, if he's not in quite the right position, the female will simply turn her head and bite his off. And then consume him, bit by bit, from the neck down. (There's a wonderful article on sexual cannibalism here.) Now, at first sight, this seems rather counter-productive - why kill and eat your mate right in the middle (or perhaps at the start) of mating? Certainly, the female is getting a nice fresh nutritious meal that would go a long way towards meeting the energy & nutrient requirements of forming and laying eggs. But surely that's not much good if her partner's now deceased? And there's nothing in it for him, is there? Gould points out that decapitated males are actually better in bed than their intact brethren: they perform harder and for longer, thus potentially transferring more of their sperm to the female. This is because much of the mechanical movement of mating is controlled by a nerve plexus at the end of the male's abdomen, and this plexus is in turn controlled by the cerebral ganglia (the 'brain') in the insect's head. Removing the head is followed by immediate, repeated, and prolonged mating behaviour. And there's certainly evidence from other species that duration of copulation is linked to the amount of sperm transferred - and many examples of males bearing gifts for their partner and through this obtaining a longer sex act. In hanging flies, for example, duration of mating is directly linked to the size of the 'nuptial gift', typically another insect: males who offer bigger gifts get to mate for longer and transfer more sperm to the female (and are less likely to be consumed themselves). In some species of hanging flies, the male first wraps his gift in silk - it takes a while to unwrap & in the meantime he's begun copulating. 3. Sex and Size 4. Living with Connections 5. A Most Ingenious Paradox 2. Theory and Perception 6. Adam's Navel 7. The Freezing of Noah 8. False Premise, Good Science 9. For Want of a Metaphor 3. The Importance of Taxonomy 10. Of Wasps and WASPs 11. Opus 100 The one essay devoted to his own work, titled "Opus 100", is the 100th essay Gould wrote for Natural History. He starts by stating the two rules he followed rigidly for the previous 99 essays: "I never lie to you, and I strive mightily not to bore you". Then he states he's going to risk the second by indulging in his favourite topic. It's actually a very interesting and entertaining essay. http://brummellblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/book-club-flamingos-smile.html 12. Human Equality Is a Contingent Fact of History 13. The Rule of Five 4. Trends and Their Meaning 14. Losing the Edge - Postscript: Strike Three for Babe 15. Death and Transfiguration 16. Reducing Riddles 5. Politics and Progress 17. To Show an Ape 18. Bound by the Great Chain 19. The Hottentot Venus 20. Carrie Buck's Daughter 21. Singapore Patrimony (and Matrimony) 6. Darwinia 22. Hannah West's Left Shoulder and the Origin of Natural Selection 23. Darwin at Sea - and the Virtues of Port 24. A Short Way to Corn 7. Life Here and Elsewhere 25. Just in the Middle 26. Mind and Supermind 27. SETI and the Wisdom of Casey Stengel 8. Extinction and Continuity 28. Sex, Drugs, Disasters and the Extinction of Dinosaurs 29. Continuity 30. The Cosmic Dance of Siva False science - predictions of a seccond sun called Nemesis that causes periodic extinctions, a predicted planet, Vulcan, between mercury and the sun, and other false predictions in science. Bibliography Index Evolution And The .400 Hitter September 22, 1985 David Quammen http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0CEFD8133BF931A1575AC0A963948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all David Quammen's most recent book is "Natural Acts," a collection of essays on science and natural history. THE FLAMINGO'S SMILE Reflections in Natural History. By Stephen Jay Gould. Illustrated. 476 pp. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. $17.95. STEPHEN JAY GOULD knows the value of using vivid particulars to communicate abstract scientific ideas. When he writes about such biological oddities as the inverted jellyfish Cassiopea, the praying mantis's mating habits, the giant panda's extra "thumb" or the flamingo's inverted jaw, he does so with a double purpose - to entertain us with fascinating details while teaching us a few general concepts. Every oddity he describes stands on its own as a discrete fact of nature, an individual mystery, as well as yielding an example of some broader principle. This lively approach - "letting generality cascade out of particulars," in his own words - is displayed again in his latest collection of essays, "The Flamingo's Smile." Mr. Gould himself is a rare and wonderful animal - a member of the endangered species known as the ruby-throated polymath. He teaches biology and geology and the history of science at Harvard University; writes a monthly column for Natural History magazine (where most of these pieces appeared), and is a leading theorist on large-scale patterns in evolution, an influential historian of science, an incurable Gilbert-and-Sullivan buff, a shameless punster and a serious baseball fan. Somehow he also finds time for fieldwork on West Indian land snails, especially Cerion, a protean genus on which he must surely be the world's foremost authority. Of the snail research he writes: "Scientists don't immerse themselves in particulars only for the grandiose (or self-serving) reason that such studies may lead to important generalities. We do it for fun. The pure joy of discovery transcends import." But the import, transcended or not, is always there, both in what Cerion has to say about evolution in general and in the writings that Mr. Gould offers to us lay people. "The Flamingo's Smile" is as much fun as a Bahamian vacation (with or without snail research), yet it is also a densely informative and challenging book. These are not the sort of nature essays to be read late at night in the last woozy minutes before sleep. You'll want the full use of your brain. In "Only His Wings Remained," a representative essay, he discusses the phenomenon known as sexual cannibalism. Among mantises, black widow spiders and a certain species of desert scorpion, the female sometimes makes a meal of the male just after (or during, for the mantis) the act of mating. Some biologists have argued that this mate-eating represents a programmed adaptive strategy in which the male voluntarily offers his body as food to advance the prospects of those eggs he has fertilized. Mr. Gould says that as tantalizing as this notion may be, it is not well supported by evidence, and that evolutionary reality often confounds the evolutionist's neat expectations. "Sexual cannibalism with active male complicity should be favored in many groups (for the conditions of limited opportunity after mating and useful fodder are often met), but it has rarely evolved, if ever. Ask why we don't see it where it should occur." Mr. Gould asks that question, then answers that the evolution of life has been a succession of contingent happenings, not a logically inevitable course of events, and that accidents of history have often foreclosed possibilities. The male black widow might have evolved self-sacrificial tendencies in a perfectly logical universe, but evolution reflects history, not logic. That evolutionary history is shaped by contingent events is one of the main themes of "The Flamingo's Smile." Mr. Gould also reflects on the nature of the scientific enterprise: "Science, in its most fundamental definition, is a fruitful mode of inquiry, not a list of enticing conclusions. . . . Useless speculation turns in on itself and leads nowhere; good science, containing both seeds for its potential refutation and implications for more and different testable knowledge, reaches out." Mr. Gould himself constantly reaches out, groping (sometimes straining) for connections among disparate ideas, phenomena and disciplines. Neoteny and Mickey Mouse. The Kinsey Report and the taxonomy of wasps. The evolutionary principle of decreasing variations within established patterns and the disappearance of .400 hitters in baseball. I N the book's title essay, he discusses how and why the flamingo has evolved a beak suited for eating upside down. To the flamingo he adds Cassiopea, that inverted jellyfish, and an African catfish whose anatomy hasn't yet made adjustment to its own upside-down habits. From this trio Mr. Gould extracts a general point about the unrecognized contribution Darwin's predecessor Lamarck made to evolutionary theory. That same busy essay begins with an anecdote about Buffalo Bill and ends with the 14th-century motto of an Oxford college. History, biology, geology and popular culture all swirl about in Mr. Gould's mind and in his writing like the primordial gumbo of Precambrian oceans. Mr. Gould's tone in "The Flamingo's Smile" is chatty and informal. Of course a chatty and informal tone is not to be confused with graceful writing. Graceful these essays are not - there are too many digressions and flat-footed reiterations, too little concern for pace and rhythm and economy and polish. For all the precision of his thought and his research, his syntax and language are sometimes confoundingly imprecise. But never mind. Sleekness and polish seem almost irrelevant to the grand evolutionary pageant that Stephen Jay Gould shows us. He is one of the sharpest and most humane thinkers in the sciences. UMBILICUS FINESSED The ample fig leaf served our artistic forefathers well as a botanical shield against indecent exposure for Adam and Eve, our naked parents in the primeval bliss and innocence of Eden. Yet, in many ancient paintings, foliage hides more than Adam's genitalia; a wandering vine covers his navel as well. If modesty enjoined the genital shroud, a very different motive - mystery - placed a plant over his belly. In a theological debate more portentous than the old argument about angels on pinpoints, many earnest people of faith had wondered whether Adam had a navel. He was, after all, not born of a woman and required no remnant of his nonexistent umbilical cord. Yet, in creating a prototype, would not God make his first man like all the rest to follow? Would God, in other words, not create with the appearance of preexistence? In the absence of definite guidance to resolve this vexatious issue, and not wishing to incur anyone's wrath, many painters literally hedged and covered Adam's belly. A few centuries later, as the nascent science of geology gathered evidence for the earth's enormous antiquity, some advocates of biblical literalism revived this old argument for our entire planet. - From "The Flamingo's Smile."