Diamond, Jared M.;
Why Is Sex Fun?: The Evolution of Human Sexuality
Basic Books, 1998 (c1997), 176 pages
ISBN 0465031269, 9780465031269
topics: | sex | biology | evolution
Preface:
Among the unusual aspects of human sexuality that I discuss are female menopause, the role of men in human societies, having sex in private, often having sex for fun rather than for procreation, and the expansion of women's breasts even before use in lactation.
[opening lines:] If your dog had your brain and could communicate, and if you asked it what it thought of your sex life, you might be surprised by its response. It would be something like this:
Those disgusting humans have sex any day of the month! Barbara proposes sex even when she knows perfectly well that she isn't fertile — like just after her period. John is eager for sex all the time, without caring whether his efforts could result in a baby or not. But if you want to hear something really gross — Barbara and John kept on having sex while she was pregnant! That's as bad as all the times when John's parents come for a visit, and I can hear them too having sex, although John's mother went through this thing they call menopause years ago. Now she can't have babies anymore, but she still wants sex, and John's father obliges her. What a waste of effort! Here's the weirdest thing of all: Barbara and John, and John's parents, close the bedroom door and have sex in private, instead of doing it in front of their friends like any self-respecting dog!
a) in most of the 4300 mammal species, male and female meet only to copulate, the male rarely contributes to child-raising. Exceptions include polygynous male zebras and gorillas with harems of females, male gibbons paired off with females as solitary couples, and saddleback tamarin monkeys, of which two adult males are kept as a harem by one polyandrous adult female. b) in most mammal species, female ovulation is widely advertised, (e.g. area around the vagina turning bright red, special smells, etc.). c) Except for a handful of species like bonobo chimps and dolphins, sex is only when the female is oestrous. sex is also expensive - it can cost your life to lower the guard, so having it for fun is quite unusual. d) in most cases, sex is public. among chimps, a couple may pair off for a couple of days, but the female may also have public sex with some other male within the same estrus cycle. d) menopause is not known in the animal kingdom. [ At this point, I thought for a bit if this may not have been a recent evolutionary change. But surely menopause was known in ancient times, when life expectancy was 40? It must have been, for many indiv's would have lived to be 80-100. Hence it is not an artifact of the unprecedented rise in human longevity in the last few hundred years. What of the hypothesis that other species may experience it but rarely live long enough for us to know? But I am sure JM has done his homework, so these are probably just idle ruminations. - AM]
The male of several species of spiders and mantises is routinely eaten by his mate just after or even as he is copulating with her. This cannibalism clearly involves the male's consent, because the male of these species approaches the female, makes no attempt to escape, and may even bend his head and thorax toward the female's mouth so that she may munch her way through most of his body while his abdomen remains to complete the job of injecting sperm into her. mating black widow spiders (Latrodectus dahli, native to west asia). the small male is on top. it makes no attempt to escape; if the female is hungry, he will be eaten. males will try to sense the more dangerous females and avoid them. (image source: https://entomologymanchester.wordpress.com/2010/07/) For some species of spiders and mantises living at low population densities, a male is lucky to encounter a female at all, and such luck is unlikely to strike twice. The male's best strategy is to produce as many offspring bearing his genes as possible out of this lucky find. The larger a female's nutritional reserves, the more calories and protein she has available to transform into eggs. If the male departed after mating, he would probably2 not find another female and his continued survival would thus be useless. Instead, by encouraging the female to eat him, he enables her to produce more eggs bearing his genes. In addition, a female spider whose mouth is distracted by munching a male's body allows copulation with the male genitalia to proceed for a longer time. [p.16-17] [Ultimately, in biology, it is only the genes that survive, not the organism. Gives us pause to ponder on the greater purposes of life - what's the purpose of reading books and typing in excerpts?] [but the extreme size diphormism in spiders is caused by many factors. in the tarantula Augacephalus junodi, which lives in dry climates with occasional flooding, the big female lives securely in an underground burrow. the more active male has to be a lot smaller so it can survive the vagaries of climate. (see research by Dmitri Logunov ) ]
Most fathers make some contribution to their children, even if it's just food or defense or land rights. We take such contribution so much for granted that they're written into law: divorced fathers owe child support; an unwed mother can sue a man for child support if genetic tests prove that he is her child's father. [p.21] Most male mammals have no involvement with either their offspring or their offspring's mother after inseminating her; they are too busy seeking other females to inseminate. [21] [If] the newly fertilized, laid, or hatched egg has absolutely zero chance of surviving unless it is cared for by one parent [then] there is indeed a conflict of interest. Should one parent succeed in foisting the obligation of parental care onto the other parent and then going off in search of a new sex partner, then the foister will have advanced her or his genetic interests at the expense of the abandoned parent. [26] Whether it actually pays you to desert depends on whether you can count on your old mate to finish rearing the kids, and whether you are then likely to find a receptive new mate. [It is as if they are playing a game of chicken.] Which parent is more likely to back down? The answer depends on three considerations: 1. which parent has more invested in the fertilized egg; 2. whether chances of propagating the genes by finding alternate partners is greater than that of looking after the current offspring; and 3. the parent's confidence in paternity or maternity of the egg. [p.27] By the end of a nine-month pregnancy a human mother's expenditure of time and energy is colossal in comparison with her husband's or boyfriend's pathetically slight investment during the few minutes it took him to copulate and extrude his one milliliter of sperm. [Leads to the lactation / guarding of eggs by females. In organisms where the inputs are equal, e.g. in external fertilization, the father, if he is sure of having inseminated the eggs - as in (some frogs or fish), may also look after the eggs' safety, thus ensuring at least the survival of those genes. ] [31] A man produces about two hundred million sperm in one ejaculate -- or at least a few tens of millions, even if reports of a decline in human sperm count in recent decades are correct. By ejaculating once every 28 days during his recent partner's 280-day pregnancy - a frequency of ejaculation well within the reach of most men -- he would broadcast enough sperm to fertilize every one of the world's approximately two billion reproductively mature women. That is the evolutionary logic that induces so many men to desert a woman immediately after impregnating her and to move on to the next woman. A man who devotes himself to child care potentially forecloses many alternative opportunities. [p.33, Argument 2 from p.27 above] [Female mammals are confident of paternity, but] Male parental care would be a bad evolutionary gamble. [34]
One type is those species whose eggs are fertilized externally. The female ejects her not yet fertilized eggs; the male, hovering nearby or already grasping the female, spreads his sperm on the eggs; he immediately scoops up the eggs, before any other males have a chance to cloud the picture with their sperm; and proceeds to care for the eggs, completely confident in his paternity. [35] [Second type - Sex-role-reversal-polyandry] Big females compete fiercely to acquire a harem of smaller males, for each of which in turn the female lays a clutch of eggs, and each of which proceeds to do most or all the work of incubating the eggs and rearing the young. The best known of these female sultans are the shore birds called jacanas (alias lily-trotters), Spotted Sandpipers, Wilson's Phalaropes. [Reason for reversal - the chicks are precocial, implying much development in the egg stage; hence a single parent can more easily raise them; also this is why the females are larger - four eggs constitute upto 80% of a female sandpiper's weight. But then since these are shore birds, there is a high percentage of predation - so the male is better off if the eggs for some reason are lost, to have the female rested to do a second round (which she may of course do with another male also). p.38 ]
Third type, like humans, is where the child bearing is so onerous that a single parent would not be able to do it. Most birds. But here too, most males philander (MRS), and many females are content to be the second-woman (often, e.g. the Pied Flycatchers, they are tricked) p.42] Don Giovanni - seduced 1,003 women in Spain alone - one Spanish woman every eleven days. In contrast if a male Pied Flycatcher temporarily leaveshis mate (for instance, to find food), then on the average another male enters his territory in ten minutes and copulates with his mate in thirty-four minutes. Twenty-nine percent of all observed copulations prove to be EPC's, and an estimated 24 percent of all nestlings are 'illegitimate'. [45]
Women with two husbands have as many offsprings as those with one; polyandry arose to prevent land-division; brothers marry same wife; in contrast, female phalarope - with one male - 1.3 chicks, two - 2.2, and 3.7 with three (hmmm - third case - data sanity?). See Nayar's TC p. 75qq] Polygyny paid off well for nineteenth century Mormon men, whose average lifetime output of children increased from a mere seven children for Mormon men with one wife to sixteen or twenty children with two or three wives, respectively, and to twenty-five for church leaders, who averaged five wives. [49] In chromosomes 1 through 22 the two chromosome pairs are identical. Only chromosome 23 is unpaired and that too only for males - who have a big chromosome (X) paired with a small one (Y). Women have two paired X chromosomes. Among non-reproductive functions, colour vision is determined by the X chromosome. If a Y chromosome is present, the bet-hedging gonad begins to commit itself in the seventh week to becoming a testis, but if there is no Y chromosome, the gonad waits until the thirteenth week to develop a ovary . . . People with one Y and two X chromoomes turn out most like males, whereas people with three or just one X chromosome turn out most like females. [54] 'Being a male is a prolonged, uneasy, and risky venture; it is a kind of struggle against inherent trends toward femaleness.' - endocrinologist Alfred Jost. [55] [endocrnology : study of hormones and their effects, glands that produce hormones, etc.] embryos also start out hedging with two sets of ducts, known as the Mullerian ducts and Wolffian ducts. In the absence of testes, the Wolffian ducts atrophy, while the Mullerian ducts grow into a female fetus's uterus, fallopain tubes, and interior vagina. With testes present, the opposite happens: androgens stimulate the Wolffian ducts to grow into a male feturs's seminal fesicles, vas deferens, and epididymis, and the testicles produce a protein called Mullerian inhibiting hormone. [58] [enzyme defects - some male hermaphrodites are more according to the norms of "female pulchritude" - bigger breasts, long legs,] cases have turned up repeatedly of beautiful women fashion models not realizing that they are actually men with a single mutant gene [that prevents an enzyme creation/function [you found out when you fail to menstruate - p.60]
(excerpts from WSIF continuess below)
Discover Magazine June 1992 [discovermagazine.com/1992/jun/turningaman62] Barbara grew up as an apparently normal girl enjoying a happy childhood. As her teenage years approached, she looked forward to experiencing the same sexual development she saw in older girls. Gradually, however, she began to have a vague sense that the expected changes weren’t happening in her. By the age of 14 she was really worried: she had not yet menstruated and her breasts showed no signs of growth. What she did have was a pain in her left groin that eventually subsided, only to be replaced by the appearance of a mass in the left side of her labia. With growing shock, she felt her voice dropping, her facial hair growing, and her clitoris enlarging to become more and more like a penis. After Barbara's sixteenth birthday, her penis developed erections, she produced ejaculations, and she found herself feeling a sexual interest in girls. By now she had become convinced that she was really a boy and that the mysteriously shifting mass within her was in actuality a testis. But Barbara still struggled with the problem of how to present herself to her parents and friends, before whom she avoided being caught naked. She knew they had to suspect something. When they found out, would they ridicule her--or him--as a freak? The vast majority of us are born unmistakably male or female and remain that way throughout life. To find one's gender ambiguous or shifting is as cruel a blow as could befall one's ego. It's as close as any of our children might come to the nightmare experienced by Gregor Samsa, of Franz Kafka's terrifying story Metamorphosis, who wakes up one morning to find himself transformed into a human-size insect.
Between the fifth and seventh week after fertilization, human embryos of either sex develop an all-purpose gonad that can later become either a testis or an ovary. If a Y chromosome is present, that all-purpose gonad will begin to commit itself by the eighth week to becoming a testis. But if there's no Y chromosome, it waits until the thirteenth week and then begins developing as an ovary. Thus the natural tendency of our primordial gonad is to develop as an ovary if nothing intervenes; something special, a Y chromosome, is required to change it into a testis. [after this], in the eighth week of gestation the testes begin producing the hormone testosterone, some of which gets converted into the closely related substance dihydrotestosterone, or DHT. Such hormones are called androgens. DHT goes on to convert some all-purpose embryonic structures into the glans penis, penis shaft, and scrotum. Those same structures would otherwise develop into their female equivalents: the clitoris, labia minora, and labia majora. Embryos also start out with two sets of ducts, known as the Müllerian ducts and the Wolffian ducts. In the absence of testes the Wolffian ducts atrophy, while the Müllerian ducts grow into a female's uterus, fallopian tubes, and the inner part of the vagina. With testes present, the opposite happens: androgens produced by the testes stimulate the Wolffian ducts to grow into a male's seminal vesicles, vas deferens, and epididymis. At the same time, a testicular protein called Müllerian inhibiting factor does what its name implies: it prevents the Müllerian ducts from developing into the internal female organs. a long series of further biochemical steps, programmed by chromosomes other than the sex chromosomes, is required to produce all the structures other than ovaries or testes. Every step involves the synthesis of one enzyme, specified by one gene. If any one gene is altered by a mutation, the enzyme for which it's responsible may be defective or absent. Thus, an enzyme defect may result in a male pseudohermaphrodite, defined as someone with one X and one Y chromosome, and hence intrinsically male, but with a mixture of both male and female structures.
Type I: looks like a normal woman. Indeed, "she" often conforms to the male ideal of feminine beauty even more than the average woman does because her breasts tend to be well developed and her legs long and graceful. Her complexion is usually flawless and she tends to have the added height of a man. Hence, cases have turned up repeatedly among female fashion models. Since this type of pseudohermaphrodite looks like a normal baby girl at birth and externally undergoes normal development and puberty, the problem isn't even likely to be recognized until the adolescent consults a doctor over her failure to begin menstruating. At that point the doctor discovers a simple reason for that failure: the patient has no uterus, fallopian tubes, or upper vagina. Instead, the vagina ends blindly without connecting to a uterus (although it is generally adequate for intercourse). Further examination reveals testes that are normal except for being buried in the groin or labia; they secrete normal testosterone and are programmed by a normal Y chromosome. In other words, the beautiful model is a male who happens to have a genetically determined biochemical block in the ability to respond to testosterone... That block turns out to be in the cell receptor that would normally bind testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and thereby enable those androgens to trigger further steps in the development of male genitals. Take away that androgen receptor and all you normal male readers might look like beautiful models, too. Since the pseudohermaphrodites' Y chromosome is normal, the testes themselves form normally and produce normal Müllerian inhibiting factor, which acts as it does in any man to forestall development of the uterus and fallopian tubes. However, the process by which the usual male machinery is activated by testosterone is interrupted. As a result, development of the remaining all-purpose embryonic sex organs follows the female channel by default: female rather than male external genitalia, atrophy of the Wolffian ducts, and hence no development of male internal genitalia. The second type of pseudohermaphrodite is exemplified by the case of Barbara. Dozens of similar people suffer from an enzyme defect called 5-alpha-reductase (5AR) deficiency. Like the pseudohermaphrodites with defective androgen receptors, they are genetically males, with a normal Y chromosome and testes and normal production of testosterone and Müllerian inhibiting factor. Because of this inhibiting factor they don't develop a uterus, fallopian tubes, or the internal part of the vagina. Their external genitals appear largely female at birth, though they may be somewhat ambiguous and have some male features; this ambiguity sometimes allows babies with 5AR deficiency to be recognized at birth. At puberty, however, many of these children become much more male-like.
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1774373 http://jenapincott.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/when-the-perfect-woman-is-genetically-male/ Years ago, in college, I met the perfect woman. Or perhaps a man's idea of the perfect woman. She had flawless and dewy skin, angular cheekbones, a cinched waist, milkmaid breasts, long legs, dove-like hands, lush long hair. Wherever she went, people swiveled their necks and stared. She was a fantasy, a vision. A goddess. And she was miserable. It emerged that the source of her pain was a secret that she kept until she enrolled in a radical gender studies class. Inspired, she came to terms with her identity, and in the telling she liberated herself. Her secret was that she wasn’t technically female. She had a condition known as androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). She was the perfect woman on the outside, and inside she felt perfectly female. But she was genetically male (XY). Her story was typical for women with complete AIS. At birth her doctors didn’t notice any difference in her genitalia. In high school she went from being a normal girl to an Amazonian queen. She was not only taller than her peers but curvier, too (some androgens are converted to estrogen which act on breast tissue). Unlike other girls, she never got acne or grew pubic or armpit hair (androgens regulate hair growth). She had no body odor. She got recruited as a runway model, was attracted to men and had many boyfriends (including a celebrity), and had sex, albeit painfully. But by age sixteen she didn’t get her period, so her mother brought her to the doctor and an astonishing discovery was made. She had undescended testes. Inside, she appeared male: no fallopian tubes, no uterus, no ovaries. This gorgeous college student had complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Women with this condition — approximately 1 in 20,000 — tend to be exceptionally tall and striking in appearance. AIS is caused by a recessive variant of the gene that codes for Androgen Receptor. Because the body is insensitive to the androgen testosterone, the usual male features — penis, testes, scrotum, etc. — are unable to develop. The default phenotype is female, so people with AIS have a vagina or "vaginal pouch" (although most AIS women require surgical expansion). If a woman with AIS were to get a blood test, her testosterone levels would be as high as any man's, but her body can’t process the hormone. That's why women with complete AIS are so feminine — arguably more so than other women. (Some people with AIS have only partial androgen insensitivity. Considered intersex, or hermaphrodites, they fall all along the spectrum between typically male and female and have a micropenis. Naturally, there's much controversy about gender assignment at birth and estrogen or testosterone injections at puberty.)
from http://www.oddee.com/item_98035.aspx 1/11/2012 transsexual models are popping up in magazines and on runways everywhere. These gorgeous models look and feel like women but were born with male reproductive organs. * Andrej Pejic: Serbian Australian model. In January 2011's Paris fashion shows he walked both the men's and women's shows for Jean-Paul Gaultier and the men's shows for Marc Jacobs. He has also ranked #18 on the models.com Top 50 Male Models list while simultaneously being ranked #98 in FHM's "100 Sexiest Women in the World * Lea T. Brazilian Lea T. was born Leandro Cerezo in 1981, but that didn't stop her from becoming one of the most famous transsexual fashion models in the industry today. Lea has been called the muse of high fashion design house Givenchy. http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/27698/slide_27698_286148_huge.jpg * Claudia Charriez a top international model, Charriez was kicked off of America's Next Top Model and The Janice Dickinson Modeling Agency TV shows in 2008, but went on to win the America's Next Top Transsexual Model contest on The Tyra Banks Show later that year. http://transgriot.blogspot.com/2008/08/claudia-charriez-speaks.html http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/100429/11/4bd9cc6e45a7f.jpg * Isis King Born Darrell Walls in 1985, American model Isis King gained notoriety when she became the first transgender contestant ever to appear on the modeling reality show America's Next Top Model. http://antm411.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/antm_isis01.jpg * Florencia De La V Argentinian Florencia De La V b. 1976 as Roberto Carlos has gone on to be one of the most recognizable transgendered actresses in the world. is currently married to a man and the mother to twin babies conceived via surrogate. In 2010, after a court decision, Trinidad was legally recognized as a woman, and changed her name. * Sirapassorn Atthayakorn [Thailand] was named Miss International Queen in 2011's pageant. http://www.missinternationalqueen.com/index.htm * Chamila Asanka (Sri Lankan, a.k.a. Chami) an up-and-comer in the world fashion industry. A 2011 contestant in the Miss International Queen pageant. http://srilankanmodels.picshuts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Chamila-Asanka_12_srilankanmodels.picshuts.com_.jpg * Caroline "Tula" Cossey (England) had a small role in the James Bond movie The Living Daylights, posed for Playboy, and wrote an autobiography called "I Am A Woman." Caroline Cossey http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_KCRRRCnjIXE/TNnFKHDl8aI/AAAAAAAAAIc/g9GjtWizZ70/s1600/caroline+cossey+tula_01.jpg * Roberta Close Brazilian model Roberta Close was the first pre-operative transsexual model to pose for the Brazilian edition of Playboy magazine. After undergoing gender reassignment surgery in 1989, Close posed nude for a Brazilian men's magazine called Sexy and was then voted "Most Beautiful Woman in Brazil." http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldq5ybb44J1qe4m1ko1_500.jpg * India's Malika has undergone four surgeries to become the woman she feels she was meant to be at birth. In 2011 she became the first Indian to be chosen to compete in the annual Miss International Queen competition in Thailand, a beauty pageant for transgendered people. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tamil-nadu-transgender-malika-in-pattaya-beauty-pageant/1/155032.html
Roy J Levin and Nether Edge, 2007 The human sexual response - similarities and differences in the Anatomy and function of the male and female genitalia http://www.indiana.edu/~kinres/chapters/Levin.pdf J. The psychophysiology of sex (2007): 35-56. There has always been a fascination to compare and contrast the human male and female genitals that at first sight appear so very different. Despite the obvious external differences, an early anatomical portrayal of the female vagina was surprisingly drawn as being like the male's elongated penis but turned inside out! However, it was not until quite recent times with the discoveries of the human X and Y chromosomes and the study of the development of the fertilised mammalian egg that the mammalian male and female genitalia differentiation [began to be understood. Both start] from the same primitive tissue (the genital anlagen) was driven differently by the Y chromosome which encodes a gene referred to as TDF (testis determining factor) which initiates the conversion of the indifferent foetal gonad (the ovo-testis) into a functional testis locally secreting the Antimullerian Factor to prevent the development of the female Mullerian duct system and systemic testosterone to maintain and develop the male Wollfian duct system and the external genitalia (Jost 1973, Wilson 1978). the Y chromosome which encodes a gene referred to as TDF (testis determining factor) which initiates the conversion of the indifferent foetal gonad (the ovo-testis) into a functional testis locally secreting the Antimullerian Factor to prevent the development of the female Mullerian duct system and systemic testosterone to maintain and develop the male Wollfian duct system and the external genitalia ( Jost 1973, Wilson 1978). In the absence of the Y chromosome the testis determining pathway is not initiated and the ovotestis develops as an ovary and the foetal differentiation takes the female route. Female development can be regarded as the default model, it is the basic pattern onto which the male differentiation is impressed, even the presence of oestrogen is not thought of as necessary for the female genitalia to develop (Jost 1973, Wilson 1978) Wilson J (1978) Sexual differentiation. Ann Rev Physiol l40:279-308. Jost A (1973) Becoming male. Adv Biosci 10, 3-13. ---
Possible determinants of sexual identity: How to make the least bad choice in children with ambiguous genitalia P.D.E. Mouriquand BJU International Journal, v. 93, s3, pages 1–2, May 2004 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04701.x/full the genetic sex of the child affects gonadal differentiation. For primitive surgeons as we are, it appeared that there are four categories of fetuses; the normal 46XY and the normal 46XX at each end of the spectrum, and in the middle the Y-deficient fetus and the X-deficient fetus. Clearly the ‘Y-deficient’ child with abnormal gonads and insufficient virilization represents one of the most difficult situations in determining the sex of rearing. How can a male fetus be virilized in the extraordinary bath of oestrogen in which he lives for 9 months? We all read the fascinating experiments by Jost [1] last century on the role of testicular tissue in sexual differentiation but still the fetal ‘hormonal factory’ remains full of mysteries. The placenta certainly has a key role, as shown in the example of twin boys, one with hypospadias the other with normal external genitalia [2]. Very young mothers and ‘old’ mothers seem to be more at risk of having babies with abnormal genitalia [3]. Babies with a low birth weight are more prone to present the same anomaly. The common denominator could be a placental deficiency. It is postulated that the rise of testicular androgen secretion during the perinatal period could be the determinant to ‘sexualize’ the brain. However, I recently operated on a 29-year-old African (46XX) patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, no breasts, a hairy chest and beard, a very large clitoris and no vaginal opening. She was brought to my clinic by a humanitarian organization who noticed that she was rejected from her community in Africa. Although she had been bathed in high testosterone levels for 29 years, she felt as if she were female and asked for reconstructive surgery. This example shows that high testosterone levels are not sufficient to determine sexual inclination. The third factor which may influence sexual behaviour is external genital appearance. For generations of doctors, creating a penis or an intercourse conduit (i.e. a vagina) was the main determining factor to establish a ‘sexual identity’. With experience and longer follow-up we know that this is not certain and several patients rebelled against this rather primitive concept. Clearly it is easier for the surgeon to create a female appearance with a genital conduit rather than a decent organ from a poor penis. Stimulating the genital tubercle by giving high doses of testosterone remains a standard method to establish the growing potential of the penis. If the response is poor, many will orientate the child to a female image, and if it is good they will choose the male gender. The long-term studies by Schober (Reilly) and Woodhouse [4] seem to show that male patients with small penises are quite happy with their sexual life and it might be wrong to orientate a child to the female gender just because his penis has poor growth potential. Moreover, the long-term consequences of these hormonal stimulations on the bone, brain and gonadal development are essentially unknown. How much harm is caused to patients with partial insensitivity syndrome who receive hormones to stimulate the growth of the genital tubercle?
[continuing with WSIF]
surrogate mothers can produce some milk within three or four weeks: earlier, put the infant or a puppy to the breast repeatedly (e.g. mother wanting to replace sickly daughter). Modern times - breast pump every few hours in preparation. ] Breast development occurs commonly and spontaneous lactation occasionally, in men recovering from starvation. Thousands of cases were recorded in prisoners of war released from concentration camps after WWII - five hundred in survivors of one Japanese POW camp alone. Starvation inhibits not only the hormones, but also the liver, which destroys the hormones. When normal nutrition is resumed, the glands producing hormones recover much faster than the liver. [66-7] [Dyak fruit bats - may have males and females nursing the baby 67-8] PREDICTION: Human male lactation: Paternity buttressed by DNA testing will make expectant fathers to make milk via breast stimulation and hormonal injections. [Will promote] a type of emotional bonding of father to child now available only to women. Many men, in fact, are jealous of the special bond arising from breast-feeding, whose traditional restriction to mothers makes men feel excluded. . . . Many of us choose to renounce murder, rape, and genocide, despite their advantages as a means for transmitting our genes, and despite their widespread occurrence among other animal species and earlier human societies. Will male lactation become another such counter-evolutionary choice? [80-81]
fins of ancestral fishes --> legs in reptiles, birds, mammals; front legs --> bird wings, bird wings --> penguin flippers, mammal legs --> whale flippers Similarly, concealed ovulation, boldly advertised ovulation, monogamy, harems, promiscuity, etc have repeatedly been transmuted into each other, reinvented and lost. [114]
[Studies on Paraguay's Northern Ache Indians by Kristen Hawkes of U. Utah: Hunters bring in 9.6Kcals on avg for the 10K by the woman. While the peak for hunters is much higher - 40K for the occasional peccary, the median, at 4.7K is much less, and] the Ache' men would do better in the long run by sticking to the unheroic 'woman's job' of pounding palms than by their devotion to the excitement of the chase. Real reasons may be social standing: Ache' women, asked to name the potential fathers of 66 children, named an average of 2.1 men per child [their sex partners at the time of conception). Good hunters were named more often than poor hunters. Reproductive strategies for males - 'provider' vs 'showoff' - showoff is better - why? Women prefer the provider for husband, but may trade EPC with the showoff for the occasional extra meat. [130] Time budget studies show that American working women spend on the average twice as many hours on their responsibilities. When husbands are asked, they tend to overestimate their own hours and to understimate their wives hours. That is why the question What are men good for? continues to be debated within our societies. [135]
appeal to the opposite sex may depend on specific parts of the body, as is well known for humans. In an experimenting demonstrating this point, the tails of male Long-Tailed Widowbirds, an African species in which the male's sixteen inch tail was suspected of playing a role in attracting females, were lengthened or shortened. It turns out that a male whose tail is experimentally cut down to six inches attracts few mates, while a male with a tail extended to twenty-six inches by attaching an extra piece with glue attracts extra mates. [171] The Great Tit has a white stripe on the breast which serves as a signal of social status. Experiments with radio-controlled tit models placed at bird feeders show that live tits flying into the feeder retreat if and only if the model's stripe is wider than the intruder's. . . . Why should a perfectly good Great Tit retreat from food just because it sees another bird with a slightly wider black stripe? [Unlikely to imply intimidating strength; can lead to genetic movement towards increadingly thicker stripes.] These questions are still unresolved. [172]
Signals such as throwing away money (indicative of wealth), or a peacock's extra long tail are evolutionarily useful, and are not only honest signals, that inferior animals could not afford [Amos Zahavi] but also favouring survival, or being closely linked to traits favouring survival [Brown and Brown]. e.g. large antlers in deer - need bio-energy resources - but also help in fighting off other males. ] 175 Human signals include faces, smells, hair color, men's beards, and women's breasts. What makes those structures less ludicrous than a long tail as grounds for selecting a spouse? If we think that we have a signaling system immune to cheating why do so many people resort to makeup, hair dyes, and breast augmentation? [177] . . . we humans still carry the legacy of hundreds of millions of years of vertebrate evolution engraved deeply into our sexuality. Over that legacy, our art, language, and culture have only recently added a veneer. [191] [Three honest measures of individual capability in humans: muscles (more useful than antlers), facial beauty (face is expressive; age, malnutrition, and injury shows quickest on face), woman's body fat (needed for lactation, indicative of surplus resources). 180-1] [Location of excess fat in breasts and hips - can't be on limbs, therefore torso. Where on torso can vary - more on buttocks for some groups - e.g. women of the andaman island tribes - but excess fat on the lactation region is significant - it acts as a deceptive signal of lactation capability. 183]
At first we seem devoid of exaggerated signaling structures comparable to a widowbird's sixteen-inch tail. On reflection, however, I wonder whether we actually do sport such a structure: a man's penis. [ 187: Evidence - differences with apes; what men "want" (phallocarps 2 ft long; ), ] In response to my question as to why they wore phallocarps, the Ketebangans replied that they felt naked and immodest without them. . . . they were otherwise completely naked and left even their testes exposed. . . . Starting from a 1.5 inch ancestral ape penis similar to the penis of a modern gorilla or orangutan, the human penis increased in length by a runaway process, conveying an advantage to its owner as an increasingly conspicuous signal of virility. [Who is it intended for - may be for male dominance as much as for attracting females (which is doubtful) -190]
1. The animal with the weirdest sex life 2. Battle of the sexes 3. Why don't men breast-feed their babies? The non-evolution of male lactation 4. Wrong time for love: the evolution of recreational sex 5. What are men good for? The evolution of men's roles 6. Making more by making less: the evolution of female menopause 7. Truth in advertising: the evolution of body signals. --- blurb: Why are humans one of the few species to have sex in private? Why do humans have sex any day of the month or year — including when the female is pregnant, beyond her reproductive years, or between her fertile cycles? Why are human females the only mammals to go through menopause? Why is the human penis so unnecessarily large? Why do we differ so radically in these and other important aspects of our sexuality from our closest animal relatives and ancestors?With wit and fascinating scientific expertise, the author of The The Third Chimpanzee explores the mystifying evolutionary forces that gave shape to our sexual distinctions and shows how they contributed to what it means to