Chomsky, Noam;
Understanding Power
Penguin Books India 2003
ISBN 0143029916
topics: | politics | philosophy
Culled from lectures and conversations spanning a ten-year period (1989-1999), Understanding Power [uses a] question-and-answer format. Chomsky holds forth on all manner of topics, from American imperialism and human nature to the politics of dissent and the terminal condition of unmoderated capitalism. Chomsky's polemic is rigorous and accessible, typically lucid, exhaustively researched and often darkly comic. on the shortcomings of the free market catechism: "You can't make driving a car survivable by driving well yourself; there has to be some kind of social contract involved, otherwise it won't work. If there was no social contract involved in driving –if everybody was going as fast as they can and forgetting all the traffic lights and everything else- you couldn't make that situation safe just by driving well yourself. The trouble is, that's the way capitalism works. The nature of the system is that it's supposed to be driven by greed; no-one's supposed to be concerned for anybody else, nobody's supposed to worry about the common good -those are not the things that are supposed to motivate you, that's the principle of the system. The theory is that private vices lead to public benefits -that's what they teach you in economics departments. It's all total bullshit, of course, but that's what they teach you...” Another throwaway nugget strips away the ostensible neutrality of such terms as ‘capital flow’ and ‘market confidence’ to reveal the implicit threat so often hidden behind their use: “Suppose Massachusetts were to increase business taxes. Most of the population is in favour of it, but you can predict what would happen. Business would run a public relations campaign saying: ‘You raise taxes on business, you soak the rich, and you'll find that capital is going to flow elsewhere, and you're not going to have any jobs, and you're not going to have anything.’ That's not the way they'd put it exactly, but that's what it would amount to: ‘Unless you make us happy you're not going to have anything, because we own the place; you live here, but we own the place…’ ‘It's going to hurt jobs, it's going to hurt investment, there's going to be a loss of business confidence’, and so on. That's just a complicated way of saying, unless you keep business happy, the population isn't going to have anything..."