Austad, Steven N.;
Why We Age: What Science Is Discovering about the Body's Journey Through Life
Wiley, 1997, 256 pages
ISBN 0471148032 9780471148036
topics: | health | aging
In his book Advice to a Young Scientist, Peter Medawar suggests, "Study what interests people." (on why he's looking at aging; preface)
In Westminster Abbey, where England buries with solemn honor its greatest poets, painters, scientists, and statesmen, lie the bones of one rather ordinary man - Thomas Parr. A farmer's servant from Shropshire, Thomas Parr's only claim to distinction is that he managed to convince a gullible seventeenth-century public that he had been alive for more than 150 years. Although Parr did manage to have himself interred among the anointed paragons of English history, had he not made his claim to great longevity, he probably would not have been dragged in from the provinces to be exhibited before the king like an exotic plant from the New World. And if he hadn't been so exhibited, he might not have caught the illness that, a short time later, finished his mendacious history at the declared age of 152, sending him straightaway to rest at Westminster. [gullibility is not only part of the unsophisticated gentry of the seventeenth century] 1966: Life magazine, for instance, published an article in 1966 on an area in the Georgian Caucasus where people commonly claim to live for more than 100 years. focused on Shirali Muslimov, 161 years old at the time. He had married his current wife when he was supposedly 110, and still seemed hearty and energetic... When he died seven years after the Life article appeared, the news was reported around the world. October 1979: American newspapers reported that Charlie Smith, who claimed a boyhood memory of being brought to the United States as a slave in 1854, had died at the age of 137. Smith had a brief run in the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest-lived human... television show... But Smith's claim was disproved shortly before his death when a marriage certificate surfaced that he filled out when he was 35 years old in 1910. In truth, Smith died at the respectable, though not unheard of, age of 104.
It's apparent to anyone who cares to notice that the elderly live in a state of relatively fragile health. And generally speaking, the more elderly they grew, the more fragile they became. In thinking that aging is as inevitable as, say, the passage of time, we are committing what might be called the fallacy of the machine. That is, we tacitly assume that our bodies are like machines that must inevitably wear out. The flesh is assumed quite literally to be weak and doomed to eventual failure. However, living organisms are very different from machines. The most fundamental defining character of living organisms, in fact, may be their ability to repair themselves. We don't usually die of cuts, bruises, or even broken bones. These injuries mend, and life goes on. Some animals perform remarkable feats of self-repair. Tear a starfish in half, for instance, and each half will regrow its missing half, so that you eventually end up with two healthy starfish. [Also, animals don't start out aging] For the first part of our lives, for instance, we actually improve in virtually every bodily function... p.4
Some cells in our bodies can achieve immortality, but only by turning cancerous. For instance, in 1951 a few such cells were removed from Henrietta Lacks, a terminally ill young woman from Baltimore. They have been irrepressibly growing and dividing in laboratory culture dishes ever since. Known as HeLa cells, they are now so numerous that they are used to study the biology of cells in hundreds of laboratories around the world. But normal cells, as opposed to cancerous cells, do not grow and divide forever. In a similar laboratory dish, normal cells from, say, skin or lungs will grow and divide for a time, then stop. So why can't "normal" cells have the immortal properties of "abnormal" cancer cells? p.4 Differences in longevity: dogs - speed through life in 15 years instead of the human 70.
As Lord Kelvin once rather pompously declared, "Until you have measured something, you don't know what you are talking about." Of course, Lord Kelvin is now famous for having deduced from the temperature of the earth that it could be no more than a few hundred thousand years old, thus demonstrating that even if you have measured it, you still may not know what you are talking about. (present estimates: earth is 4.5 billion years old). [Medawar's experiment on the life of test tubes in the laboratory]